Generic Review Tools and Mistaking Form With Function Fatal To Productivity

May We Recommend...

Generic vs. Specific Tools - General feedback from rating systems not enough to improve performance

There is a strong tendency for HR departments to want a consistent method for evaluating, reviewing, and documenting performance.

They have some valid reasons for wanting this, at least from their perspectives, since it helps them do their jobs and makes their lives easier.

Since personnel records (and usually documents related to performance reviews) end up with HR, they usually provide a standard form or set of forms for managers to use. Since the forms are “standard,” they are by necessity generic and not related specifically to any one particular job. In some cases, more sophisticated HR departments will provide different forms for managers and for janitors, for example, but nonetheless standardization is an important goal for HR departments.

The problem, though, is that a generic set of forms doesn’t bring out or record information specifically enough to help managers and employees improve performance. If managers
follow the form and the standard processes suggested or required by HR and do only the minimum (completing the form), the process becomes virtually useless. That’s because
general estimates of employee attitudes or skills aren’t going to improve anything—although they are good at making employees angry. To improve performance, you need specifics and your employees need specifics.

Dialogue overcomes many performance appraisal flawsAs a manager, you may be working with performance review tools that are flawed and way too general. That’s a good example of how your performance can be affected by an outside variable. The solution, apart from lobbying to improve the tools, is to go beyond them. Nobody requires you to limit your discussions during performance reviews to only what is on the form. Get specific.

Forms vs. Process

Another feature that distinguishes between failed reviews and successful reviews is the emphasis: is it on completing the forms or on carrying out a productive and constructive practice?

One common complaint of both managers and employees regarding performance reviews is that it seems like “one big paper chase”: apart from getting forms completed, they don’t
see any purpose in it. Managers often set the focus on forms both before and during review meetings. If the goal of performance reviews is perceived as completing forms, it’s damaging.

 


About Company

Bacal & Associates was founded in 1992 by consultant and book author, Robert Bacal. Robert's books on performance management and reviews have been published by McGraw-Hill. He is available for consultation, training and keynote speaking on performance and management at work.

About

Robert Bacal

Keynotes/Conferences
Bacal's Books
About The Company
About Our Performance Management Philosophy
Seminars
Sitemap
Privacy Policy

Our Related Websites

Leadership Resource Center
Upgrade your understanding of modern leadership in a complex world. Stay current.

The Planning Resource Center

From strategic planning for businesses, small and large, right through to financial planning for millennials, stay current with the latest thoughts and actions on planning.

Bacal & Associates Store
Free and paid guides, books, and documents on business, management and more.

We Believe

  • Performance management and appraisal MUST be a partnership between manager and employee where BOTH benefit.
  • Performance management can be the lever for improved employee engagement.
  • The review process is the LEAST important part of performance management
  • If managers aren't managing employee performance, why are they there?

Get in Touch

  • Phone:
    (613) 764-0241
  • Email: ceo@work911.com
  • Address:

  • Bacal & Associates
  • 722 St. Isidore Rd.
  • Casselman
  • Ontario
  • Canada, K0A 1M0