Does Rank and Yank Put The Company At Legal Risk and Law Suits?

The simple answer is a resounding YES! Because the rank and yank system is somewhat mechanistic, is often based on poor or non-objective criteria and is subject to bias, the result is that some protected classes (minorities, women, older workers) may be disproportionally affected by forced ranking and rank and yank. That means legal actions through the EEOC (or other anti-discrimination legislation bodies), and even class action suits. Because of its high profile and importance in a company, any flaws in the system that push it across the legal lines will be obvious and challenged.

Is there precedent? Yes.

Ford, Goodyear, and Capital One have all been sued for age-related discrimination associated with forced rankings and rank and yank. According to this reference, both Ford and GM have abandoned the use of forced rankings and rank and yank. Here's a quote from the article linked above:

A survey by Pittsburgh-based Development Dimensions International, Inc. (DDI) suggested that the use of forced ranking systems had decreased more than 300 percent since 1993. www.ddiworld.com/pdf/CPGN43.pdf. DDI found that only 39 percent of companies using forced ranking systems found them even moderately effective. Kim Clark, Judgment Day, U.S. NEWS AND WORLD REP., Jan. 13, 2003, at 31. Adding the risk of litigation arising from the use of forced ranking systems to this poor performance ought to give pause for thought to any business considering implementing such a system.

Microsoft has also been sued for its use of forced rankings and rank and yank. Here's an additional quote:

Grading is highly subjective at Microsoft, according to Peter M. Browne, a former executive who is also suing the company, charging discrimination. Mr. Browne, who is black, said managers were forced to use a curve in evaluating even small groups. He said he had to rate a group of five on a curve, for example, in deciding which ones would not receive stock options.

"You weren't told anything — just meet the curve," Mr. Browne said.

He says managers ended up favoring people with whom they socialized. "People gravitate to people who are like them, and the system just forces that," he said.

• Busy? We walk you through the complete process of managing performance, from goal setting to addressing performance problems and discipline issues. Contains ALL our help cards, and here's a sneak peak: Walk the path WITH employees.
• Well, we do. Here's a low cost mini-guide FOR EMPLOYEES so they can be active participants in a truly collaborative performance review.
• Well, you can't, so this short LearnByte guides explains how to identify barriers to employee performance, in order to clear them away. Diagnosing is the key to productivity improvement.
• Ok. Now you can have a reusable checklist so you don't miss any of the critical steps needed to succeed with your employee reviews.
• Save huge amounts of time and frustration during performance review meetings, by having set proper goals and objectives for the employee. Isn't that your job? To make sure employees know what they need to accomplish?
• If you think performance management = performance appraisal, you NEED this badly.
• ...and how damaging to your employees. We'll walk you through the entire process of dealing with performance problems with one goal: To FIX them, and improve productivity. And we ask for less than 20 minutes of your time.
• Prefer Kindle? Many of our quick read helpcards and also our books on performance management and reviews and how to make them work, are available via Amazon on the KINDLE. Click here to go direct.
• It's 2013, not 1945 and it's time to lose the industrial mindset and use management tools for THIS century. Here's ten steps to improvement.

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9

jQuery Image Slider With Thumbnails by WOWSlider.com v2.6